Rating criteria · 38 CFR §4.124a
Carpal Tunnel & Hand Nerves: VA Rating Criteria
The exact rating criteria below are quoted from the Code of Federal Regulations as currently in force, not paraphrased. Compensation amounts come from the current VA rate tables.
Plain-language guide
What this rating actually turns on
The fact that quietly decides most carpal-tunnel claims is a note buried in the peripheral-nerve rules: when the nerve involvement is wholly sensory, the rating is capped at the mild, or at most the moderate, degree, however much the hand bothers you. Carpal tunnel is a median-nerve problem, and VA rates it as nerve impairment under 38 CFR 4.124a: the median nerve is Diagnostic Code 8515 and the ulnar nerve (often injured alongside it, or the real culprit in “cubital tunnel”) is DC 8516. Each is graded on a paralysis scale, mild / moderate / severe for incomplete paralysis, then complete, with separate columns for the major (dominant) and minor hand determined under 38 CFR 4.69.
Median nerve (8515): mild incomplete pays 10 percent on either hand; moderate is 30 major / 20 minor; severe is 50 major / 40 minor; complete paralysis (the classic “ape hand,” no thumb opposition, cannot make a fist) is 70 major / 60 minor. Ulnar nerve (8516): mild 10 percent; moderate 30 / 20; severe 40 / 30; complete (“griffin claw” deformity) 60 / 50.
Early or classic carpal tunnel is often numbness and tingling with no measurable muscle loss, which is wholly sensory and therefore held to that moderate ceiling no matter how much it bothers you. To reach severe or complete you generally need documented motor findings, thenar muscle atrophy, weakness of grip or thumb opposition, or abnormal nerve-conduction results, not just paresthesia.
A worked example
An Army mechanic, right-hand dominant, files for carpal tunnel in his right wrist. His symptoms are miserable: constant numbness in the thumb and first two fingers, tingling that wakes him nightly, and he drops sockets and coffee cups. On the Peripheral Nerves DBQ the examiner finds decreased sensation across the median distribution but full strength, no thenar atrophy, and normal reflexes, and his EMG shows sensory slowing only, with no motor involvement.
Read literally, dropping tools sounds like a severe hand. But the claim runs straight into the wholly-sensory note. Because the objective findings are sensory only, with no motor deficit, the involvement is wholly sensory and the rating is capped at moderate however bad the numbness feels. Moderate incomplete paralysis of the median nerve (DC 8515) on the dominant hand is 30 percent (it would be 20 percent on the non-dominant hand). To climb to severe, 50 percent on the dominant side, he would need the exam to document motor loss, thenar atrophy or measured grip weakness, or denervation on the EMG. Until that shows up in the file, 30 percent is the ceiling, and describing the numbness as unbearable will not move it.
What the C&P exam measures
The examiner completes the Peripheral Nerves Conditions DBQ. It grades strength, deep tendon reflexes, and sensation nerve by nerve, checks for muscle atrophy and trophic changes, and translates the findings into a severity for the affected nerve. Because “wholly sensory versus motor involvement” is the hinge between a capped rating and an uncapped one, this is the exam to prepare for concretely: report dropped objects, grip failure, and loss of fine control (buttons, keys, tools), not only night-time numbness. Bring your electrodiagnostic study (EMG/nerve conduction) if you have one; objective slowing or denervation is what supports a higher level.
What to have in your file
Per VA’s evidence requirements: nerve-conduction/EMG reports, treatment records for splinting, injections, or release surgery, and any note documenting atrophy or measured weakness. Lay statements (VA Form 21-10210) that describe functional loss over time help push a claim past the wholly-sensory ceiling when they line up with clinical findings.
Common mistakes
- Confusing pain intensity with rating level. Severe symptoms that are still purely sensory are held to the moderate cap. The path to a higher rating runs through documented motor deficit, not through describing the numbness as unbearable.
- Missing the secondary route. Carpal tunnel is frequently secondary to another service-connected condition (diabetic peripheral neuropathy, cervical radiculopathy, rheumatoid or thyroid disease, or overuse of a wrist compensating for another injury). If your median-nerve problem flows from something already service-connected, claim it as secondary service connection, which needs a nexus, not proof of an in-service injury.
- Double-rating the same nerve. You cannot stack paralysis, neuritis, and neuralgia on one nerve; pick the one that yields the correct evaluation (38 CFR 4.14).
Worth knowing
VA can also code the condition as neuritis (median 8615, ulnar 8616) or neuralgia (median 8715, ulnar 8716) rather than paralysis, and those labels carry their own ceilings. Under 38 CFR 4.123, neuritis with organic changes (loss of reflexes, muscle atrophy, sensory disturbance, constant pain) maxes at the severe-incomplete level, but neuritis without those organic changes is capped at moderate. Under 38 CFR 4.124, neuralgia is capped at moderate incomplete paralysis. Peripheral-nerve ratings are for one side; when both hands are affected, VA combines them and adds the bilateral factor, which the calculator handles.
Rating criteria from the CFR
| Rating criteria | Major | Minor |
|---|---|---|
| Complete; the hand inclined to the ulnar side, the index and middle fingers more extended than normally, considerable atrophy of the muscles of the thenar eminence, the thumb in the plane of the hand (ape hand); pronation incomplete and defective, absence of flexion of index finger and feeble flexion of middle finger, cannot make a fist, index and middle fingers remain extended; cannot flex distal phalanx of thumb, defective opposition and abduction of the thumb, at right angles to palm; flexion of wrist weakened; pain with trophic disturbances | ||
| Incomplete: | ||
| Severe | ||
| Moderate | ||
| Mild |
| Rating criteria | Major | Minor |
|---|---|---|
| Complete; the “griffin claw” deformity, due to flexor contraction of ring and little fingers, atrophy very marked in dorsal interspace and thenar and hypothenar eminences; loss of extension of ring and little fingers cannot spread the fingers (or reverse), cannot adduct the thumb; flexion of wrist weakened | ||
| Incomplete: | ||
| Severe | ||
| Moderate | ||
| Mild |
Diagnostic Code 8615, Neuritis. See the regulation text for how this code is evaluated.
Diagnostic Code 8616, Neuritis. See the regulation text for how this code is evaluated.
Diagnostic Code 8715, Neuralgia. See the regulation text for how this code is evaluated.
Diagnostic Code 8716, Neuralgia. See the regulation text for how this code is evaluated.
SOURCE: eCFR, 38 CFR Part 4 (issue date 2026-07-13, current through 2026-07-24) · retrieved 2026-07-28
Monthly compensation at each rating level
Veteran-alone amounts, effective 2025-12-01. Dependents increase these amounts at 30% and above, use the combined rating calculator for your exact situation, especially if this isn't your only rated condition.
| Rating | Monthly (veteran alone) |
|---|---|
| $1,808.45 | |
| $1,435.02 | |
| $1,132.90 | |
| $795.84 | |
| $552.47 | |
| $180.42 |
SOURCE: VA compensation rate tables, va.gov · retrieved 2026-07-28 · effective 2025-12-01
Frequently asked questions
What is the highest VA rating for carpal tunnel & hand nerves?
Under 38 CFR §4.124a, the highest schedular rating for carpal tunnel & hand nerves is 70%, which pays $1,808.45 a month for a veteran with no dependents on the current rate tables (effective 2025-12-01). Reaching it means the exam and records actually meet the 70% criteria quoted above, the diagnosis by itself does not set the rating.
What rating levels are possible for carpal tunnel & hand nerves?
VA can assign 10%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60% or 70%, depending on the severity your evidence documents. Every one of those steps has its own test in 38 CFR §4.124a, quoted in full on this page, so two veterans with the same diagnosis can land at very different levels based on what the exam and records show.
If your rating came back lower than this
A decision that ignores the criteria above is a frequent reason veterans are underpaid. Line your decision up against the levels on this page. If the evidence supports a higher level than VA assigned, you have three ways to challenge it, and the right one depends on why it went wrong:
- Something was missing from the record (an exam finding, a prescription, a flare-up statement, a nexus letter): add it with a Supplemental Claim.
- The evidence was already there and VA misread it: ask for a Higher-Level Review by a more senior rater, with no new evidence needed.
- A legal or judgment error: take it to the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
Line your decision up against the criteria on this page. Which review lane fits depends on why the rating is wrong: new evidence that was missing, a misread of evidence already in the file, or a legal error. All three are laid out in the decision reviews and appeals guide.
Before you file, recombine this rating with your others (VA math does not add ratings), check how long each lane is taking right now, and remember a VA-accredited representative or VSO will help you for free. You can also browse every other condition's criteria to make sure you are claiming everything you are owed.